Não olhem pra mim e me julguem pelo meu rosto, mas olhem bem fundo nos meus olhos e veja o que eu sinto. Acho que devemos viver intensamente sem ter tempo de falar mau do outro, mas infelizmente as pessoas fazem o contrário.
Se vivo intensamente, significa que eu tento saber um pouco de cada coisa da vida, para aprender a não errar. Se vivo intensamente, significa que posso transmitir o que eu sinto através dos meus olhos e dizer sem palavras que eu amo,
porque é amando que você pode olhar bem nos olhos da pessoa e saber o que realmente ela é.
 
 
 

O tempo da vida

Quando temos um sonho, queremos realizá-lo no exato momento, porque somos egoístas e impacientes, queremos tudo para nós  e sem perceber, acabamos ficando sem nada.

Tudo na vida é passageiro, toda paixão é obrigada a morrer e todo amor passa por dificuldades. O relógio corre e não dá nem tempo de fazer o que realmente precisamos, queremos ser bem vistos, mas não vemos que estamos fazendo tudo errado.

Por isso eu digo: “Não há opção melhor do que acreditar no que você está fazendo e esperar o tempo realizar, pois nossas atitudes são muitos precipitadas e não percebemos que fazemos tudo errado por escolher o caminho mais fácil. A vida  é diferente de desejo, beleza e dinheiro, a vida só se torna realmente sua se você sabe cuidar dela e isso que precisamos aprender.”

Fizemos promessas que nem nós mesmos conseguimos cumprir, desejamos aquilo que foi impossível conseguir e conseguimos aquilo que foi impossível de imaginar. O ser humano ainda não sabe lidar com o amor, com a dor e com a vida, se soubéssemos lidar com essas três simples coisas, nossas vidas seriam mais fáceis, mas infelizmente o caminho mais fácil cruza com o mais difícil e o caminho certo não tem resultados imediatos.

Os desejos tomam conta de todos os pensamentos e todos os pensamentos são reflexos desses desejos. Os olhos já não vêem as mesmas coisas, as pessoas já não pensam no ideal.

Nós temos um tempo e a vida tem outro, nossos desejos serão realizados com o tempo da vida, e por isso que temos que fazer o certo e deixar  o tempo rolar, pois amanhã você acordará e lembrará cada segundo que fez valer a pena desse futuro.

Isso é uma experiencia minha.

                                                                João Lucas Santos

 
 
sciencecenter:

Winged robot gives clues about origin of flight


Here’s what we know about the evolution of flight: By about 150 million years ago, the forests were filled with flying — or perhaps just gliding — dinosaurs like
Archaeopteryx, possibly similar to the ancestor of modern birds. What we don’t know is what primitive wings were used for before bird ancestors could fly. A study published today in the journal Bioinspiration & Biomimetics provides some fresh data for this debate, not from fossils but a winged robot.
There are two main theories for how avian flight evolved. According to the “trees-down” theory, primitive wings were used to glide down from heights. The “ground-up” theory holds that bird ancestors used their wings to “run flap” along the ground, making them faster and better able to scamper up steep inclines that got in their way. The problem with the ground-up theory is the huge speed required to achieve liftoff. By comparison, incremental improvements in gliding could have led to flight. The fossil evidence has been too scant to settle the matter.
Ronald Fearing and Kevin Peterson, engineers at the University of California, Berkeley, were not thinking about this debate when they created a 25-gram robot called DASH+Wings. It was a modification to a tiny six-legged robot called DASH, for Dynamic Autonomous Sprawled Hexapod — one of the many robots they have developed as sneaky reconnaissance for the U.S. military and other applications. Tiny ground-based robots often have difficulty getting up inclines and over objects, Fearing says, so “we had been working on exploring a hybrid locomotion mode, where flapping wings and legs combine to propel the robot.” Once they had added wings to DASH, they realized that it might be a useful tool for settling evolutionary questions.

sciencecenter:

Winged robot gives clues about origin of flight

Here’s what we know about the evolution of flight: By about 150 million years ago, the forests were filled with flying — or perhaps just gliding — dinosaurs like

Archaeopteryx, possibly similar to the ancestor of modern birds. What we don’t know is what primitive wings were used for before bird ancestors could fly. A study published today in the journal Bioinspiration & Biomimetics provides some fresh data for this debate, not from fossils but a winged robot.

There are two main theories for how avian flight evolved. According to the “trees-down” theory, primitive wings were used to glide down from heights. The “ground-up” theory holds that bird ancestors used their wings to “run flap” along the ground, making them faster and better able to scamper up steep inclines that got in their way. The problem with the ground-up theory is the huge speed required to achieve liftoff. By comparison, incremental improvements in gliding could have led to flight. The fossil evidence has been too scant to settle the matter.

Ronald Fearing and Kevin Peterson, engineers at the University of California, Berkeley, were not thinking about this debate when they created a 25-gram robot called DASH+Wings. It was a modification to a tiny six-legged robot called DASH, for Dynamic Autonomous Sprawled Hexapod — one of the many robots they have developed as sneaky reconnaissance for the U.S. military and other applications. Tiny ground-based robots often have difficulty getting up inclines and over objects, Fearing says, so “we had been working on exploring a hybrid locomotion mode, where flapping wings and legs combine to propel the robot.” Once they had added wings to DASH, they realized that it might be a useful tool for settling evolutionary questions.

 
 
amigodeamor:

”Amizade, é poder confiar em alguém de olhos fechados e saber que nunca vai tropeçar”

amigodeamor:

”Amizade, é poder confiar em alguém de olhos fechados e saber que nunca vai tropeçar”

 
 
amigodeamor:

”Não derrame lágrimas por quem não soube da valor aos seus sorrisos.”

amigodeamor:

”Não derrame lágrimas por quem não soube da valor aos seus sorrisos.”

 
 
amigodeamor:

”Vai demorar pra eu precisar de alguém assim como eu preciso de você”

amigodeamor:

”Vai demorar pra eu precisar de alguém assim como eu preciso de você”

 
 

A verdadeira bravura não esta em enfrentar animais feroses e monstros poderosos, a verdadeira bravura esta em sair pra beber com os amigos sem avisar a esposa, chegar caindo de bebado em casa a meia noite e sendo recebido com uma vassoura, e com coragem dizer: “vai varrei ou vai voar?”

 
 

Quando eu estiver morto, suplico que não me mate dentro de ti

 
 
definitelydope:

So Close Yet So Far Away (by yyz!)

definitelydope:

So Close Yet So Far Away (by yyz!)

 
 
life:

Ray Charles, the star Frank Sinatra called “the only true genius in the business” — Ray Charles: Genius in Action

life:

Ray Charles, the star Frank Sinatra called “the only true genius in the business” — Ray Charles: Genius in Action

 
 
poorartists:

Paige Bradley created one of the most striking sculptures I’ve seen in recent times. Her masterpiece, entitled Expansion, is a beautiful woman seeking inner piece but fractured and bleeding with light.
“From the moment we are born, the world tends to have a container already built for us to fit inside: a social security number, a gender, a race, a profession,” says Bradley. “I ponder if we are more defined by the container we are in than what we are inside. Would we recognize ourselves if we could expand beyond our bodies?”

poorartists:

Paige Bradley created one of the most striking sculptures I’ve seen in recent times. Her masterpiece, entitled Expansion, is a beautiful woman seeking inner piece but fractured and bleeding with light.

“From the moment we are born, the world tends to have a container already built for us to fit inside: a social security number, a gender, a race, a profession,” says Bradley. “I ponder if we are more defined by the container we are in than what we are inside. Would we recognize ourselves if we could expand beyond our bodies?”